October 2024
Grigsby v. United States: Research Tax Credit Case
Leonard and Barbara Grigsby claimed the Research Tax Credit for their company, Cajun Industries, focusing on oil refinery and flood control projects. To qualify, research must be technological and useful for new or improved business components, but not funded by grants or contracts.
The IRS challenged their claim, and the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana ruled against them. The court found their projects didn’t meet the necessary criteria and noted they failed to update their claims from products to processes in time. Some projects were also funded, making them ineligible.
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld this decision, agreeing that the projects didn’t qualify and were funded. The court confirmed the IRS’s assessment was correct, and the Grigsbys couldn’t prove otherwise. In the case of Grigsby v. United States, it is likely that SCOTUS did not see the case as presenting a significant federal question or a conflict that needed resolution at the national level. The decision of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was likely deemed sufficient to resolve the issues at hand.
- Background and Legal Framework:
- The R&D tax credit, under Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code, provides a tax credit for qualified research expenses, including wages and expenditures incurred in pursuit of qualified research.
- Qualified research must be technological in nature and intended to develop new or improved business components.
- Research funded by grants, contracts, or other external sources is not eligible for the credit.
- Court Findings:
- The court found that Cajun Industries’ projects did not meet the criteria for qualified research because they were not sufficiently technological and were funded by external contracts.
- The Grigsbys argued that their contracts were not funded in a way that disqualified them from the credit, but the court disagreed, stating that the contracts were contingent on the success of the research.
- Implications for Taxpayers:
- This case highlights the importance of ensuring that research activities meet all criteria for the R&D tax credit, including the requirement that the research is not funded by external sources.
- Taxpayers must carefully document their research activities and ensure that they can substantiate their claims for the credit.
If you need further details or have specific questions, please reach out to CFO Services.
IRS Circular 230 Required Notice‐‐IRS regulations require that we inform you that to the extent this communication contains any statement regarding federal taxes, that statement was not written or intended to be used, and it cannot be used, by any person (i) for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties that may be imposed on that person, or (ii) to promote, market or recommend to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.